PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than ZEO.TO's 37.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VFV.TO has outperformed ZEO.TO with an annualized return of 16.04%, while ZEO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.


VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%

ZEO.TO

1D
0.65%
1M
2.51%
YTD
37.72%
6M
32.21%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
27.08%
5Y*
25.42%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%25.14%2.94%13.67%
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
37.72%12.35%21.51%5.98%39.67%63.65%-28.56%16.50%-25.62%-12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and ZEO.TO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012

0.26

The correlation between VFV.TO and ZEO.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
100.0%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VFV.TO
35.7%
ZEO.TO

-

Financial Services

VFV.TO
11.6%
ZEO.TO

-

Communication Services

VFV.TO
11.3%
ZEO.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFV.TO
10.2%
ZEO.TO

-

Healthcare

VFV.TO
8.5%
ZEO.TO

-

Industrials

VFV.TO
8.3%
ZEO.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

VFV.TO
4.9%
ZEO.TO

-

Energy

VFV.TO
3.5%
ZEO.TO
100.0%

Utilities

VFV.TO
2.4%
ZEO.TO

-

Real Estate

VFV.TO
1.9%
ZEO.TO

-

Basic Materials

VFV.TO
1.8%
ZEO.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEO.TO
ZEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFV.TOZEO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.52

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

5.34

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

17.25

-4.15

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFV.TO and ZEO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFV.TOZEO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

3.02

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.39

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.00

+1.14

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.43%, smaller than the maximum ZEO.TO drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and ZEO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFV.TOZEO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-77.71%

+50.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-9.54%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-17.62%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-22.59%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

-72.03%

+44.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-2.93%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-21.98%

+18.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.95%

-0.69%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) is 3.05%, while BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that VFV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFV.TOZEO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

6.99%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

14.57%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

16.92%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

21.17%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

27.27%

-10.70%

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEO.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ZEO.TO's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
2.59%3.42%3.86%4.82%4.69%3.27%5.54%3.55%3.57%2.46%2.50%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFV.TO and ZEO.TO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.

VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while ZEO.TO is Energy Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZEO.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.60% for ZEO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and ZEO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer