VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO
VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) and ZEO.TO (BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ZEO.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VFV.TO returned 16.04%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for ZEO.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFV.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ZEO.TO.
Performance
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than ZEO.TO's 37.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VFV.TO has outperformed ZEO.TO with an annualized return of 16.04%, while ZEO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
ZEO.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.08%
- 5Y*
- 25.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.30% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 23.23% | -12.58% | 27.51% | 15.62% | 25.14% | 2.94% | 13.67% |
ZEO.TO BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF | 37.72% | 12.35% | 21.51% | 5.98% | 39.67% | 63.65% | -28.56% | 16.50% | -25.62% | -12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFV.TO and ZEO.TO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between VFV.TO and ZEO.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Financial Services
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Communication Services
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Healthcare
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Industrials
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Energy
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
Utilities
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Real Estate
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Basic Materials
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VFV.TO
ZEO.TO
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFV.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.52 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 5.34 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 17.25 | -4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFV.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 3.02 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.39 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.00 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.43%, smaller than the maximum ZEO.TO drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and ZEO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFV.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.43% | -77.71% | +50.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -9.54% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -17.62% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -22.59% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.43% | -72.03% | +44.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -2.93% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -21.98% | +18.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.95% | -0.69% |
Volatility
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) is 3.05%, while BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that VFV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFV.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 6.99% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 14.57% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 16.92% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 21.17% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 27.27% | -10.70% |
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEO.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFV.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Dividend Comparison
VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ZEO.TO's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
ZEO.TO BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF | 2.59% | 3.42% | 3.86% | 4.82% | 4.69% | 3.27% | 5.54% | 3.55% | 3.57% | 2.46% | 2.50% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFV.TO and ZEO.TO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.
VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while ZEO.TO is Energy Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZEO.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.60% for ZEO.TO.
Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and ZEO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer