PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VFV.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFV.TO having a 12.30% return and XUU-U.TO slightly higher at 12.58%.


VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%

XUU-U.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
7.44%
YTD
12.58%
6M
10.92%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%7.25%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.58%11.00%33.03%23.73%-14.72%26.98%16.71%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.36

Over the past year, VFV.TO and XUU-U.TO have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XUU-U.TO
XUU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFV.TOXUU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.49

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.49

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

13.31

-0.21

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFV.TO and XUU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFV.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.51

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.97

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.96

+0.18

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.43%, which is greater than XUU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and XUU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFV.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-24.77%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-8.58%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-20.06%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-22.68%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-4.88%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.25%

+0.01%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) at 2.86%. This indicates that VFV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFV.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.86%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

9.19%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

11.93%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

16.25%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

17.36%

-0.79%

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU-U.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFV.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than XUU-U.TO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.83%0.76%0.85%1.01%0.77%0.90%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFV.TO and XUU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFV.TO.

VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XUU-U.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.08% for XUU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and XUU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer