PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VFV.TO is traded in CAD, while XUS-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUS-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFV.TO having a 12.30% return and XUS-U.TO slightly lower at 11.92%.


VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%

XUS-U.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
7.46%
YTD
11.92%
6M
10.34%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%6.35%
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
11.92%12.26%35.04%23.39%-13.24%26.58%16.01%6.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2019

0.80

The correlation between VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XUS-U.TO
XUS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFV.TOXUS-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.31

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

13.10

-0.01

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFV.TOXUS-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.11

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.00

+0.14

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.43%, roughly equal to the maximum XUS-U.TO drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFV.TOXUS-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-27.29%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-8.95%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-18.70%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-22.52%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.03%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-4.57%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.25%

+0.01%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) at 2.79%. This indicates that VFV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUS-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFV.TOXUS-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.79%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

9.13%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

12.13%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

14.96%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

17.10%

-0.53%

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFV.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than XUS-U.TO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
0.82%0.91%0.74%0.90%1.04%0.71%0.91%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and XUS-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer