VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO
VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) and XEC.TO (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XEC.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFV.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for XEC.TO.
Performance
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than XEC.TO's 26.75% return.
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEC.TO
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 6M
- 27.69%
- 1Y
- 51.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.06% | 14.91% |
XEC.TO iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF | 26.75% | 18.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFV.TO and XEC.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.67 |
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Financial Services
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Communication Services
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Healthcare
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Industrials
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Consumer Defensive
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Energy
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Utilities
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Real Estate
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Basic Materials
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VFV.TO
XEC.TO
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF (XEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFV.TO | XEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 0.51 | +1.79 |
Drawdowns
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum XEC.TO drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and XEC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFV.TO | XEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -32.54% | +23.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.79% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -9.56% | +8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFV.TO | XEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 18.23% | -6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 15.91% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 17.60% | -5.95% |
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XEC.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFV.TO vs. XEC.TO - Dividend Comparison
VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than XEC.TO's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEC.TO iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF | 1.52% | 1.92% | 2.03% | 2.16% | 2.28% | 2.78% | 1.64% | 2.87% | 2.66% | 2.13% | 1.80% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFV.TO and XEC.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XEC.TO.
VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XEC.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XEC.TO tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.28% for XEC.TO.
Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and XEC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer