PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than XAW.TO's 14.15% return.


VFV.TO

1D
-2.35%
1M
2.71%
YTD
10.06%
6M
8.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAW.TO

1D
0.40%
1M
6.30%
YTD
14.15%
6M
12.98%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
21.98%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and XAW.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.94

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFV.TO
XAW.TO

Technology

35.7%
32.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
13.7%

Communication Services

11.3%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.8%

Industrials

8.3%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.6%

Energy

3.5%
3.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.8%

Technology

VFV.TO
35.7%
XAW.TO
32.6%

Financial Services

VFV.TO
11.6%
XAW.TO
13.7%

Communication Services

VFV.TO
11.3%
XAW.TO
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VFV.TO
10.2%
XAW.TO
8.8%

Healthcare

VFV.TO
8.5%
XAW.TO
7.8%

Industrials

VFV.TO
8.3%
XAW.TO
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

VFV.TO
4.9%
XAW.TO
4.6%

Energy

VFV.TO
3.5%
XAW.TO
3.3%

Utilities

VFV.TO
2.4%
XAW.TO
2.2%

Real Estate

VFV.TO
1.9%
XAW.TO
1.4%

Basic Materials

VFV.TO
1.8%
XAW.TO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFV.TOXAW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.30

0.79

+1.51

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum XAW.TO drawdown of -27.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and XAW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFV.TOXAW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-27.32%

+18.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

0.00%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-3.91%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFV.TOXAW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

12.25%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

13.56%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

15.12%

-3.47%

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XAW.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFV.TO vs. XAW.TO - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than XAW.TO's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.85%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.16%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VFV.TO and XAW.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XAW.TO.

VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XAW.TO is Global Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XAW.TO tracks MSCI ACWI ex Canada IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.22% for XAW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and XAW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer