PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 31.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VFV.TO has outperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 15.57%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.77% annualized return.


VFV.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
-1.44%
6M
10.58%
YTD
12.34%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
15.57%
ALL TIME*
17.55%

ENCC.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
7.81%
6M
25.10%
YTD
31.48%
1Y
41.56%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
27.81%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
-1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.63MCA$1.50MCA$2.06M
CA$58.20MCA$52.80MCA$53.83M

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.34%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.61%25.14%2.95%13.69%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
31.48%13.13%17.39%5.72%41.32%80.54%-27.98%6.56%-30.99%-18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2012

0.19

The correlation between VFV.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFV.TO
ENCC.TO

Technology

39.1%

-

Financial Services

10.9%

-

Communication Services

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%
100.0%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

VFV.TO
39.1%
ENCC.TO

-

Financial Services

VFV.TO
10.9%
ENCC.TO

-

Communication Services

VFV.TO
10.7%
ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFV.TO
9.9%
ENCC.TO

-

Healthcare

VFV.TO
8.3%
ENCC.TO

-

Industrials

VFV.TO
7.8%
ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

VFV.TO
4.5%
ENCC.TO

-

Energy

VFV.TO
3.1%
ENCC.TO
100.0%

Utilities

VFV.TO
2.1%
ENCC.TO

-

Real Estate

VFV.TO
1.8%
ENCC.TO

-

Basic Materials

VFV.TO
1.7%
ENCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFV.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

4.83

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

13.84

-5.03

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFV.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.43%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and ENCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFV.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-93.29%

+65.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-8.48%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-16.67%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-25.58%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

-82.15%

+54.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-24.31%

+22.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-55.78%

+52.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.95%

-0.60%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) is 3.76%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that VFV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFV.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

5.50%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

12.71%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

15.41%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

22.54%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

29.01%

-12.41%

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFV.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
11.09%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.11%8.37%6.93%4.34%3.03%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.85%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.69%1.51%1.65%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFV.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for ENCC.TO.

VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while ENCC.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.92% for ENCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer