VFV.TO vs. BMNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BMNR (BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, VFV.TO returned 27.54% vs 194.00% for BMNR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VFV.TO is traded in CAD, while BMNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BMNR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly higher than BMNR's -39.40% return.

VFV.TO

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 11.07%
• 6M: 10.94%
• 1Y: 27.54%
• 3Y*: 22.63%
• 5Y*: 16.33%
• 10Y*: 16.12%

BMNR

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: -22.33%
• YTD: -39.40%
• 6M: -53.08%
• 1Y: 194.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF	11.07%	15.61%
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.	-39.40%	275.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and BMNR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. BMNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO

VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

BMNR

BMNR Risk / Return Rank: 79
BMNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
BMNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BMNR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BMNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BMNR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFV.TO	BMNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	0.27	+2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	8.27	-5.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.98	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.22	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	2.67	+9.43

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the BMNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFV.TO and BMNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.43%, smaller than the maximum BMNR drawdown of -88.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and BMNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFV.TO	BMNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.43%	-88.10%	+60.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-88.10%	+79.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-87.71%	+86.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-70.44%	+67.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	73.03%	-70.75%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) is 4.49%, while BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) has a volatility of 22.82%. This indicates that VFV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFV.TO	BMNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	22.82%	-18.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	61.26%	-52.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	719.56%	-707.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.99%	712.70%	-697.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.60%	712.70%	-696.10%

Dividends

VFV.TO vs. BMNR - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than BMNR's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.	0.06%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF	0.84%	0.92%	0.99%	1.20%	1.31%	1.06%	1.33%	1.55%	1.69%	1.51%	1.65%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFV.TO and BMNR in my portfolio?

VFV.TO and BMNR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.