PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFTNX vs. LADYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares (VFTNX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFTNX achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly lower than LADYX's 24.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VFTNX has outperformed LADYX with an annualized return of 15.83%, while LADYX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.72% annualized return.


VFTNX

1D
1.80%
1M
2.79%
6M
14.59%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
21.98%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
15.83%
ALL TIME*
7.96%

LADYX

1D
3.04%
1M
-5.24%
6M
24.24%
YTD
24.86%
1Y
41.66%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
13.72%
ALL TIME*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFTNX
Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares
13.15%17.32%26.01%31.77%-24.20%27.76%22.62%33.96%-3.41%24.19%
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
24.86%14.64%22.21%8.74%-35.92%-2.50%72.82%31.89%4.89%30.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VFTNX and LADYX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2000

0.81

The correlation between VFTNX and LADYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFTNX vs. LADYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFTNX
VFTNX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VFTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VFTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LADYX
LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares (VFTNX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFTNXLADYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.20

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

7.78

-0.05

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFTNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the LADYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFTNX and LADYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFTNX drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, which is greater than LADYX's maximum drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFTNX and LADYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFTNXLADYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.04%

-60.18%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-18.41%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

-32.06%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-50.98%

+21.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

-54.05%

+19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.80%

+9.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.61%

-20.06%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

5.19%

-2.20%

Volatility

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares (VFTNX) is 4.73%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that VFTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFTNXLADYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

11.42%

-6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

25.64%

-13.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

30.49%

-15.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

28.42%

-9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.10%

27.60%

-8.50%

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFTNX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LADYX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFTNX vs. LADYX - Dividend Comparison

VFTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%9.60%7.58%18.36%28.34%0.00%0.00%8.82%
VFTNX
Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.86%0.90%1.01%1.12%1.37%0.95%1.23%1.46%1.81%1.49%1.82%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFTNX and LADYX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LADYX has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to VFTNX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFTNX dropped -64.04% vs LADYX's -60.18%.

VFTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFTNX and LADYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer