VFTNX vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares (VFTNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
VFTNX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE4Good US Select Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2003. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFTNX Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares | -7.51% | 17.32% | 26.01% | 31.77% | -24.20% | 27.76% | 22.62% | 33.96% | -3.41% | 24.19% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -8.68% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFTNX achieves a -7.51% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, VFTNX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
VFTNX
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -7.51%
- 6M
- -5.69%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFTNX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VFTNX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
VFTNX
BLUEX
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares (VFTNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFTNX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | -0.66 | +1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | -0.89 | +2.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.89 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | -0.69 | +2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | -2.40 | +7.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFTNX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | -0.66 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.05 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.57 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.49 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between VFTNX and BLUEX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
VFTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFTNX Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.02% | 0.90% | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.37% | 0.95% | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 1.60% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFTNX drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFTNX and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFTNX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -54.27% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -12.19% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.11% | -21.87% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.22% | -29.06% | -5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -10.58% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -13.39% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.51% | -0.39% |
Volatility
VFTNX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Institutional Shares (VFTNX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.64%. This indicates that VFTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VFTNX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 3.64% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 7.31% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 11.01% | +8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 10.50% | +7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 16.57% | +2.46% |