PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFQY vs. VWOB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFQY vs. VWOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly higher than VWOB's 1.92% return.


VFQY

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.91%
YTD
8.55%
6M
6.89%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*

VWOB

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFQY vs. VWOB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFQY
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF
8.55%10.24%12.93%22.48%-15.74%27.96%16.97%25.75%-8.19%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
1.92%13.49%5.20%10.68%-17.39%-1.80%5.65%14.46%-0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VFQY and VWOB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.46

The correlation between VFQY and VWOB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFQY vs. VWOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFQY
VFQY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VFQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFQY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VFQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFQY Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VWOB
VWOB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VWOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWOB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VWOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWOB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFQY vs. VWOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFQYVWOBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.26

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

9.52

-1.48

VFQY vs. VWOB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFQY Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VWOB Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFQY and VWOB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFQY vs. VWOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than VWOB's maximum drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and VWOB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFQYVWOBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-26.98%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-4.48%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-7.71%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-26.98%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.53%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-4.79%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.06%

+1.39%

Volatility

VFQY vs. VWOB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) at 1.74%. This indicates that VFQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWOB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFQYVWOBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

1.74%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

4.34%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

5.29%

+8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.36%

9.19%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

9.35%

+11.49%

VFQY vs. VWOB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than VWOB's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFQY vs. VWOB - Dividend Comparison

VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than VWOB's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFQY
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF
0.82%1.17%1.34%1.38%1.43%0.98%1.22%1.34%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
5.82%5.92%6.08%5.50%5.30%4.04%4.18%4.58%4.52%4.61%4.71%4.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFQY and VWOB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFQY has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VWOB (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs VWOB's -26.98%.

On 5-year performance, VFQY leads with 8.39% vs 2.07% for VWOB. On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VWOB has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFQY has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VWOB.

VWOB has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.82% for VFQY.

VFQY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VWOB is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.15% for VWOB.

VWOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFQY and VWOB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer