PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFEM.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than VUTY.L's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VFEM.L has outperformed VUTY.L with an annualized return of 9.54%, while VUTY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.35% annualized return.


VFEM.L

1D
1.96%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
9.54%

VUTY.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.19%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
0.88%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
1.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
10.41%16.90%14.50%1.36%-7.39%0.09%11.19%15.14%-7.60%19.93%
VUTY.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.19%-1.14%2.53%-1.95%-1.84%-1.13%4.01%3.66%6.64%-6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEM.L and VUTY.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.04

The correlation between VFEM.L and VUTY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (3 years) to 0.05 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEM.L
VFEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VUTY.L
VUTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VUTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFEM.LVUTY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.14

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

0.90

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

2.13

+7.19

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the VUTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEM.L and VUTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEM.L drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, which is greater than VUTY.L's maximum drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEM.L and VUTY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFEM.LVUTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-22.66%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-5.24%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-8.28%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.58%

-16.17%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.90%

-22.66%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-17.58%

+14.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-12.63%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.23%

+0.53%

Volatility

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L) at 1.35%. This indicates that VFEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFEM.LVUTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

1.35%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

4.24%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

5.92%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

8.69%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

9.98%

+7.51%

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFEM.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VUTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFEM.L vs. VUTY.L - Dividend Comparison

VFEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than VUTY.L's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
2.06%2.36%2.31%2.63%3.28%2.26%1.94%2.43%2.73%2.22%2.22%2.82%
VUTY.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
4.26%4.40%4.00%3.47%2.06%1.19%1.64%2.42%2.24%1.64%0.92%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFEM.L and VUTY.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEM.L.

VFEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VUTY.L is Government Bonds. VFEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while VUTY.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEM.L and 0.05% for VUTY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFEM.L and VUTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer