PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VFEM.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing) and VFEG.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Vanguard tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFEM.L returned 8.88%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for VFEG.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.22% expense ratio.

Performance

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFEM.L having a 11.78% return and VFEG.L slightly lower at 11.73%.

VFEM.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.65%
YTD
11.78%
6M
12.41%
1Y
30.99%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.67%

VFEG.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.54%
YTD
11.73%
6M
12.29%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing		11.78%16.90%15.28%5.45%-3.23%3.99%15.04%4.60%
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc		11.73%17.15%14.13%1.28%-7.26%-0.01%11.28%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEM.L and VFEG.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between VFEM.L and VFEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VFEM.L
VFEG.L

Technology

29.6%
29.6%

Financial Services

20.8%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.8%

Basic Materials

7.8%
7.8%

Communication Services

7.5%
7.5%

Industrials

7.1%
7.1%

Energy

4.9%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.6%

Healthcare

3.4%
3.4%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

VFEM.L
29.6%
VFEG.L
29.6%

Financial Services

VFEM.L
20.8%
VFEG.L
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VFEM.L
10.8%
VFEG.L
10.8%

Basic Materials

VFEM.L
7.8%
VFEG.L
7.8%

Communication Services

VFEM.L
7.5%
VFEG.L
7.5%

Industrials

VFEM.L
7.1%
VFEG.L
7.1%

Energy

VFEM.L
4.9%
VFEG.L
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

VFEM.L
3.6%
VFEG.L
3.6%

Healthcare

VFEM.L
3.4%
VFEG.L
3.4%

Utilities

VFEM.L
3.0%
VFEG.L
3.0%

Real Estate

VFEM.L
1.7%
VFEG.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc

Often compared with VFEM.L:
VFEM.L vs. VWRP.LVFEM.L vs. EEMAVFEM.L vs. VUSA.LVFEM.L vs. VOOVFEM.L vs. VUKE.LVFEM.L vs. LGGG.LVFEM.L vs. VUAG.L
Often compared with VFEG.L:
VFEG.L vs. EMIM.LVFEG.L vs. EIMI.LVFEG.L vs. VEAVFEG.L vs. VUAG.LVFEG.L vs. HMEF.LVFEG.L vs. SEMA.LVFEG.L vs. VJPB.L

Return for Risk

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VFEM.L
VFEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
VFEG.L
VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VFEM.LVFEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.23
2.21

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.00
2.97

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.39

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

11.12

+0.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEM.L and VFEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VFEM.LVFEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.21

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEM.L and VFEG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VFEM.LVFEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-25.35%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.99%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-14.61%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-19.47%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.91%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.40%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-8.82%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.75%

-0.04%

Volatility

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VFEM.LVFEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

5.09%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

11.04%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

13.80%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

15.17%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.44%

+0.06%

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFEM.L and VFEG.L have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFEM.L vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison

VFEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while VFEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing		2.04%2.36%2.93%6.58%7.88%6.20%4.92%3.39%3.61%2.98%2.96%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.97, VFEM.L and VFEG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.22% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFEM.L and VFEG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.22% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFEM.L and VFEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer