PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFEM.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than CEUG.L's 11.57% return.


VFEM.L

1D
1.96%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.41%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
9.54%

CEUG.L

1D
2.06%
1M
5.84%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.31%
1Y
22.80%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
10.41%16.90%14.50%1.36%-7.39%0.09%11.19%15.14%-5.55%
CEUG.L
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
11.57%26.85%10.80%20.45%-10.50%22.91%-0.24%26.08%-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEM.L and CEUG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018

0.56

The correlation between VFEM.L and CEUG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFEM.L
CEUG.L

Technology

29.6%
14.6%

Financial Services

20.8%
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

7.8%
4.1%

Communication Services

7.5%
4.1%

Industrials

7.1%
21.4%

Energy

4.9%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
5.6%

Healthcare

3.4%
5.8%

Utilities

3.0%
6.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

VFEM.L
29.6%
CEUG.L
14.6%

Financial Services

VFEM.L
20.8%
CEUG.L
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VFEM.L
10.8%
CEUG.L
8.3%

Basic Materials

VFEM.L
7.8%
CEUG.L
4.1%

Communication Services

VFEM.L
7.5%
CEUG.L
4.1%

Industrials

VFEM.L
7.1%
CEUG.L
21.4%

Energy

VFEM.L
4.9%
CEUG.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VFEM.L
3.6%
CEUG.L
5.6%

Healthcare

VFEM.L
3.4%
CEUG.L
5.8%

Utilities

VFEM.L
3.0%
CEUG.L
6.8%

Real Estate

VFEM.L
1.7%
CEUG.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEM.L
VFEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUG.L
CEUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CEUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) and iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFEM.LCEUG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.26

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

8.53

+0.79

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the CEUG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEM.L and CEUG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEM.L drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, smaller than the maximum CEUG.L drawdown of -38.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEM.L and CEUG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFEM.LCEUG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-38.52%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-10.04%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-15.35%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.58%

-24.06%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

0.00%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-5.50%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.67%

+0.09%

Volatility

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) at 4.17%. This indicates that VFEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFEM.LCEUG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

4.17%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

11.63%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

14.27%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

16.25%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

18.09%

-0.60%

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFEM.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFEM.L vs. CEUG.L - Dividend Comparison

VFEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than CEUG.L's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEUG.L
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.32%2.53%2.81%2.73%2.84%1.81%1.77%3.05%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
2.06%2.36%2.31%2.63%3.28%2.26%1.94%2.43%2.73%2.22%2.22%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFEM.L and CEUG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEUG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEM.L.

VFEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CEUG.L is Europe Equities. VFEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while CEUG.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEM.L and 0.12% for CEUG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFEM.L and CEUG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer