PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFEG.L having a 11.73% return and VFEM.L slightly higher at 11.78%.


VFEG.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.54%
YTD
11.73%
6M
12.29%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*

VFEM.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.65%
YTD
11.78%
6M
12.41%
1Y
30.99%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
11.73%17.15%14.13%1.28%-7.26%-0.01%11.28%4.51%
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
11.78%16.90%15.28%5.45%-3.23%3.99%15.04%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEG.L and VFEM.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between VFEG.L and VFEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFEG.L
VFEM.L

Technology

29.6%
29.6%

Financial Services

20.8%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.8%

Basic Materials

7.8%
7.8%

Communication Services

7.5%
7.5%

Industrials

7.1%
7.1%

Energy

4.9%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.6%

Healthcare

3.4%
3.4%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

VFEG.L
29.6%
VFEM.L
29.6%

Financial Services

VFEG.L
20.8%
VFEM.L
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VFEG.L
10.8%
VFEM.L
10.8%

Basic Materials

VFEG.L
7.8%
VFEM.L
7.8%

Communication Services

VFEG.L
7.5%
VFEM.L
7.5%

Industrials

VFEG.L
7.1%
VFEM.L
7.1%

Energy

VFEG.L
4.9%
VFEM.L
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

VFEG.L
3.6%
VFEM.L
3.6%

Healthcare

VFEG.L
3.4%
VFEM.L
3.4%

Utilities

VFEG.L
3.0%
VFEM.L
3.0%

Real Estate

VFEG.L
1.7%
VFEM.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEG.L
VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VFEM.L
VFEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFEG.LVFEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.46

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

11.41

-0.29

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the VFEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEG.L and VFEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFEG.LVFEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.23

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.57

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.11

Drawdowns

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.35%, smaller than the maximum VFEM.L drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEG.L and VFEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFEG.LVFEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.35%

-31.32%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-8.92%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.61%

-14.68%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.47%

-15.28%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.46%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-6.87%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.71%

+0.04%

Volatility

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFEG.LVFEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.23%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

11.12%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

13.85%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

15.47%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

17.50%

-0.06%

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFEG.L and VFEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFEG.L vs. VFEM.L - Dividend Comparison

VFEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFEM.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
2.04%2.36%2.93%6.58%7.88%6.20%4.92%3.39%3.61%2.98%2.96%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VFEG.L and VFEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.22% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFEG.L and VFEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.22% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFEG.L and VFEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer