VEXC vs. XCEM
VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index while XCEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEXC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XCEM.
Performance
VEXC vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEXC achieves a 20.21% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 38.32% return.
VEXC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 20.21%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCEM
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 38.32%
- 6M
- 44.13%
- 1Y
- 71.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
VEXC vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.21% | 4.80% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 38.32% | 8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEXC and XCEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEXC vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank
VEXC
XCEM
VEXC vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEXC | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | 0.63 | +1.58 |
Drawdowns
VEXC vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEXC drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum XCEM drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEXC and XCEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEXC | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.42% | -41.24% | +28.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.25% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -8.59% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
VEXC vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEXC | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 20.89% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 17.75% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 19.72% | -0.83% |
VEXC vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEXC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEXC vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
VEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than XCEM's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.35% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VEXC and XCEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XCEM.
XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index, while XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VEXC and 0.16% for XCEM.
Find the right allocation for VEXC and XCEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer