PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEVE.L is traded in GBP, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVE.L achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L has outperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 14.06%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.01% annualized return.


VEVE.L

1D
1.79%
1M
0.63%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.37%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
14.06%

SGLN.L

1D
2.90%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
10.77%13.81%20.22%17.46%-8.34%22.68%12.44%22.89%-4.39%12.62%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-1.83%53.66%28.20%7.24%11.84%-2.82%19.93%14.63%4.36%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVE.L and SGLN.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.07

The correlation between VEVE.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVE.L
VEVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEVE.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.22

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

1.13

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.94

3.51

+12.43

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVE.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.53%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVE.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEVE.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.53%

-53.23%

+27.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-22.87%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-22.87%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-22.87%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.53%

-22.87%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-20.64%

+19.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-24.70%

+21.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

7.37%

-5.64%

Volatility

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) is 3.53%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that VEVE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEVE.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

6.68%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

20.78%

-12.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

23.82%

-13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

21.84%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

18.84%

-4.49%

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VEVE.L and SGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEVE.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.38%1.48%1.71%1.98%1.46%1.62%1.95%2.24%1.93%1.88%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEVE.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEVE.L and SGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

VEVE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. VEVE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVE.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer