PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VEVE.L vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VEVE.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Vanguard and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L returned 14.04%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for MINV.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEVE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.

Performance

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEVE.L is traded in GBP, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVE.L achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 14.04%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.

VEVE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.86%
6M
12.36%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
14.04%

MINV.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.83%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing		11.86%13.81%20.22%17.45%-8.34%22.68%12.44%22.90%-4.39%12.62%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		1.01%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVE.L and MINV.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between VEVE.L and MINV.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VEVE.L
MINV.L

Technology

29.0%
21.3%

Financial Services

15.6%
14.2%

Industrials

11.5%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.4%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
10.8%

Energy

4.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.0%

Utilities

2.6%
7.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.7%

Technology

VEVE.L
29.0%
MINV.L
21.3%

Financial Services

VEVE.L
15.6%
MINV.L
14.2%

Industrials

VEVE.L
11.5%
MINV.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VEVE.L
9.3%
MINV.L
5.4%

Communication Services

VEVE.L
9.0%
MINV.L
11.9%

Healthcare

VEVE.L
8.5%
MINV.L
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

VEVE.L
5.1%
MINV.L
10.8%

Energy

VEVE.L
4.1%
MINV.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

VEVE.L
3.4%
MINV.L
1.0%

Utilities

VEVE.L
2.6%
MINV.L
7.7%

Real Estate

VEVE.L
2.0%
MINV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

Often compared with VEVE.L:
VEVE.L vs. VWRL.LVEVE.L vs. VUSA.LVEVE.L vs. VFEM.DEVEVE.L vs. HMWO.LVEVE.L vs. FTWG.LVEVE.L vs. LGGG.LVEVE.L vs. VNRT.L
Often compared with MINV.L:
MINV.L vs. MVEW.LMINV.L vs. CSH2.LMINV.L vs. FULVXMINV.L vs. MVEA.LMINV.L vs. SPYMINV.L vs. VOOMINV.L vs. AOR

Return for Risk

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VEVE.L
VEVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VEVE.LMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.89
0.32

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.96
0.53

+3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.06

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

0.41

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

1.10

+16.55

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVE.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VEVE.LMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

0.32

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.65

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.66

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.83

+0.08

Drawdowns

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVE.L and MINV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VEVE.LMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.52%

-20.38%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-6.31%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-8.47%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-10.23%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.52%

-20.38%

-5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-3.60%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-3.74%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.33%

-0.64%

Volatility

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that VEVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VEVE.LMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.55%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

5.92%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

7.92%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

9.70%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

11.85%

+2.48%

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEVE.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing		1.23%1.38%1.48%1.71%1.98%1.46%1.62%1.95%2.24%1.93%1.88%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

VEVE.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VEVE.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVE.L and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer