PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEVE.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEVE.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVE.L achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L has outperformed INFR.L with an annualized return of 14.04%, while INFR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.


VEVE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.86%
6M
12.36%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
14.04%

INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
11.86%13.81%20.22%17.45%-8.34%22.68%12.44%22.90%-4.39%12.62%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.52%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%-4.70%20.82%4.39%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVE.L and INFR.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between VEVE.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEVE.L
INFR.L

Technology

29.0%
0.7%

Financial Services

15.6%
0.0%

Industrials

11.5%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Communication Services

9.0%
1.0%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Energy

4.1%
16.4%

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.6%
56.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
5.0%

Technology

VEVE.L
29.0%
INFR.L
0.7%

Financial Services

VEVE.L
15.6%
INFR.L
0.0%

Industrials

VEVE.L
11.5%
INFR.L
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VEVE.L
9.3%
INFR.L

-

Communication Services

VEVE.L
9.0%
INFR.L
1.0%

Healthcare

VEVE.L
8.5%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VEVE.L
5.1%
INFR.L

-

Energy

VEVE.L
4.1%
INFR.L
16.4%

Basic Materials

VEVE.L
3.4%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

VEVE.L
2.6%
INFR.L
56.0%

Real Estate

VEVE.L
2.0%
INFR.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVE.L
VEVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEVE.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.27

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.13

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

7.96

+9.69

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVE.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEVE.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

1.55

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.62

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.61

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.52

+0.40

Drawdowns

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVE.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEVE.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.52%

-34.25%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-5.19%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-11.08%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-22.87%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.52%

-26.75%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-3.70%

+3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-6.12%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.04%

-0.35%

Volatility

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) is 2.72%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that VEVE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEVE.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

3.92%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

8.92%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

10.49%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

12.26%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

14.10%

+0.23%

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEVE.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than INFR.L's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.23%1.38%1.48%1.71%1.98%1.46%1.62%1.95%2.24%1.93%1.88%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEVE.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

VEVE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. VEVE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VEVE.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVE.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer