PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEVE.AS is traded in EUR, while CYBU.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CYBU.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVE.AS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than CYBU.AS's 3.69% return.


VEVE.AS

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.23%
YTD
12.81%
6M
13.33%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
12.95%

CYBU.AS

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.40%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.08%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEVE.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF
12.81%8.22%26.33%19.38%-13.20%31.47%6.50%3.25%
CYBU.AS
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)
3.69%-9.69%18.86%4.58%8.91%9.95%-7.28%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVE.AS and CYBU.AS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

0.09

The correlation between VEVE.AS and CYBU.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVE.AS
VEVE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VEVE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBU.AS
CYBU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CYBU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEVE.ASCYBU.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.05

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

0.44

+3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.34

0.99

+16.35

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the CYBU.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVE.AS and CYBU.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEVE.ASCYBU.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.28

+2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.83

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.52

-0.17

Drawdowns

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVE.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than CYBU.AS's maximum drawdown of -15.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVE.AS and CYBU.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEVE.ASCYBU.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-15.50%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-4.26%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-12.74%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-12.74%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-7.69%

+7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-6.50%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.87%

-0.36%

Volatility

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS) at 1.41%. This indicates that VEVE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYBU.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEVE.ASCYBU.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

1.41%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

4.60%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

6.58%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

7.87%

+6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

7.79%

+9.82%

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVE.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBU.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEVE.AS vs. CYBU.AS - Dividend Comparison

VEVE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than CYBU.AS's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYBU.AS
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)
1.84%1.88%2.13%2.45%2.60%2.82%2.66%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEVE.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF
1.23%1.41%1.46%1.73%2.04%1.43%1.61%1.89%2.28%1.97%1.98%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEVE.AS and CYBU.AS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEVE.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEVE.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBU.AS.

VEVE.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while CYBU.AS is Emerging Markets Bonds. VEVE.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CYBU.AS tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VEVE.AS and 0.40% for CYBU.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVE.AS and CYBU.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer