VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L
VEUR.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing) and TSGB.L (VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - VEUR.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while TSGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEUR.L returned 10.10%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for TSGB.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEUR.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TSGB.L.
Performance
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEUR.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than TSGB.L's 12.75% return.
VEUR.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
TSGB.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing | 6.65% | 26.00% | 4.43% | 13.51% | -4.33% | 16.97% | 2.77% | 15.49% |
TSGB.L VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A | 12.75% | 19.46% | 12.13% | 14.14% | -7.29% | 19.61% | 9.42% | 11.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEUR.L and TSGB.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VEUR.L and TSGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Industrials
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Healthcare
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Technology
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Consumer Defensive
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Basic Materials
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Energy
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Utilities
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Communication Services
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Real Estate
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
VEUR.L
TSGB.L
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEUR.L | TSGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.34 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 12.99 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEUR.L | TSGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.44 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.94 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.82 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, which is greater than TSGB.L's maximum drawdown of -26.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUR.L and TSGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEUR.L | TSGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.59% | -26.20% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -8.80% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.72% | -16.64% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -16.64% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.01% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -3.41% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.26% | +0.71% |
Volatility
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L) at 3.24%. This indicates that VEUR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEUR.L | TSGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.24% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 9.65% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 12.04% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 12.92% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 14.93% | -0.01% |
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEUR.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TSGB.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEUR.L vs. TSGB.L - Dividend Comparison
VEUR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than TSGB.L's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGB.L VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A | 2.11% | 2.23% | 2.63% | 2.56% | 2.67% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.59% | 2.75% | 3.10% | 2.96% | 3.19% | 2.71% | 2.28% | 3.35% | 3.53% | 3.05% | 3.04% | 3.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEUR.L and TSGB.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEUR.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TSGB.L.
VEUR.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while TSGB.L is Global Equities. VEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while TSGB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VEUR.L and 0.20% for TSGB.L.
Find the right allocation for VEUR.L and TSGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer