PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEUR.L is traded in GBP, while TIGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TIGB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEUR.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than TIGB.L's 1.42% return.


VEUR.L

1D
0.73%
1M
3.41%
YTD
6.65%
6M
9.00%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
10.28%

TIGB.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VEUR.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing
6.65%26.00%4.43%13.51%-0.68%
TIGB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
1.42%4.10%4.94%4.27%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VEUR.L and TIGB.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2022

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEUR.L
VEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TIGB.L
TIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEUR.LTIGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.34

-1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

12.51

-10.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

73.64

-67.09

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEUR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEUR.L and TIGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEUR.LTIGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

3.87

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

5.48

-4.83

Drawdowns

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, which is greater than TIGB.L's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUR.L and TIGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEUR.LTIGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

-0.50%

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-0.30%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.72%

-0.30%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-0.03%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.05%

+2.92%

Volatility

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) at 0.45%. This indicates that VEUR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEUR.LTIGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

0.45%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

0.71%

+9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

0.97%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

0.74%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

0.74%

+14.18%

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VEUR.L and TIGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEUR.L vs. TIGB.L - Dividend Comparison

VEUR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than TIGB.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIGB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
3.92%4.11%4.93%4.53%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEUR.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing
2.59%2.75%3.10%2.96%3.19%2.71%2.28%3.35%3.53%3.05%3.04%3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEUR.L and TIGB.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEUR.L and TIGB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

VEUR.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while TIGB.L is Short-Term Bond. VEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while TIGB.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEUR.L and TIGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer