VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

VEUR.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing) and SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEUR.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEUR.L returned 10.28%/yr vs 38.69%/yr for SMGB.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEUR.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMGB.L.

Performance

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEUR.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than SMGB.L's 95.48% return.

VEUR.L

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 9.46%
• 1Y: 23.75%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 10.28%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

SMGB.L

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 10.88%
• YTD: 95.48%
• 6M: 96.93%
• 1Y: 166.11%
• 3Y*: 60.25%
• 5Y*: 38.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing	9.05%	26.03%	4.43%	13.50%	-4.33%	16.97%	0.35%
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	95.48%	38.79%	26.32%	66.15%	-27.78%	44.41%	-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VEUR.L and SMGB.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020	0.54

The correlation between VEUR.L and SMGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VEUR.L	SMGB.L
Financial Services	24.0%	-
Industrials	19.6%	-
Healthcare	12.8%	-
Technology	9.4%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	-
Basic Materials	5.7%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Utilities	4.6%	-
Communication Services	2.9%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEUR.L

VEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
VEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
VEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SMGB.L

SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VEUR.L	SMGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	4.97	-3.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	5.07	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.66	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	13.83	-11.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	45.63	-37.64

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEUR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEUR.L and SMGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum SMGB.L drawdown of -36.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUR.L and SMGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEUR.L	SMGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-36.23%	+7.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-11.94%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.70%	-36.23%	+23.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.38%	-36.23%	+19.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-4.06%	+3.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-9.78%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	3.63%	-0.66%

Volatility

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) is 2.93%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that VEUR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEUR.L	SMGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	14.05%	-11.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	26.51%	-16.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	33.19%	-21.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.77%	30.92%	-17.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.90%	30.53%	-15.63%

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEUR.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SMGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEUR.L vs. SMGB.L - Dividend Comparison

VEUR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while SMGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing	2.63%	2.75%	3.10%	2.96%	3.19%	2.71%	2.26%	3.37%	3.56%	3.01%	3.01%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEUR.L and SMGB.L in my portfolio?

VEUR.L and SMGB.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VEUR.L or SMGB.L?

On fees, VEUR.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VEUR.L or SMGB.L?

VEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMGB.L.

What is the main difference between VEUR.L and SMGB.L?

VEUR.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SMGB.L is Semiconductors. VEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SMGB.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VEUR.L and 0.35% for SMGB.L.