VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L
VEUR.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from Vanguard and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEUR.L returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEUR.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VEUR.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEUR.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEUR.L having a 10.28% annualized return and LCPE.L not far behind at 10.16%.
VEUR.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing | 6.65% | 26.00% | 4.43% | 13.51% | -4.33% | 16.97% | 2.77% | 19.67% | -9.54% | 15.39% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEUR.L and LCPE.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, VEUR.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Technology
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Energy
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
-
Communication Services
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
VEUR.L
LCPE.L
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.13 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 13.66 | -7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.44 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.04 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 1.20 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.98 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUR.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.59% | -27.05% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -6.66% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.72% | -12.39% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -12.39% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.59% | -27.05% | -1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -2.71% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -3.52% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.02% | +0.95% |
Volatility
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.81% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 8.48% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 11.29% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 17.74% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 20.60% | -5.68% |
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEUR.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
VEUR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEUR.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.59% | 2.75% | 3.10% | 2.96% | 3.19% | 2.71% | 2.28% | 3.35% | 3.53% | 3.05% | 3.04% | 3.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEUR.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEUR.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VEUR.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for VEUR.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer