PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VETZ vs. VABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VETZ vs. VABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VETZ achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than VABS's 1.53% return.


VETZ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
0.62%
6M
1.16%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VABS

1D
0.04%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VETZ vs. VABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VETZ
Academy Veteran Bond ETF
0.62%8.02%2.22%3.97%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
1.53%5.40%7.59%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VETZ and VABS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2023

0.53

The correlation between VETZ and VABS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VETZ vs. VABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VETZ
VETZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VABS
VABS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VABS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VETZ vs. VABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VETZVABSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

2.12

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

2.92

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

4.33

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.06

11.19

-3.13

VETZ vs. VABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VETZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the VABS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VETZ and VABS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VETZVABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.12

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.41

-0.56

Drawdowns

VETZ vs. VABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VETZ drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum VABS drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETZ and VABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VETZVABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-7.12%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-0.98%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-1.42%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.38%

+0.40%

Volatility

VETZ vs. VABS - Volatility Comparison

Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) at 0.39%. This indicates that VETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VETZVABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

0.39%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

1.07%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.84%

2.04%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

2.30%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

2.24%

+3.91%

VETZ vs. VABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VETZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than VABS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VETZ vs. VABS - Dividend Comparison

VETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than VABS's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
5.18%4.94%5.05%4.13%2.47%1.47%
VETZ
Academy Veteran Bond ETF
6.17%6.14%5.89%1.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VETZ and VABS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VETZ has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to VABS (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VETZ dropped -5.16% vs VABS's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, VETZ leads with 6.99% vs 4.30% for VABS. On fees, VETZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VETZ has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VETZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VABS.

VETZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 5.18% for VABS.

They also come from different issuers: Academy and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VETZ and 0.39% for VABS.

VABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VETZ and VABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer