VETZ vs. LMBS
VETZ (Academy Veteran Bond ETF) and LMBS (First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VETZ returned 6.99% vs 6.17% for LMBS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VETZ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LMBS.
Performance
VETZ vs. LMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VETZ achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than LMBS's 1.34% return.
VETZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMBS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
VETZ vs. LMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VETZ Academy Veteran Bond ETF | 0.62% | 8.02% | 2.22% | 3.97% |
LMBS First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 1.34% | 7.05% | 5.15% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VETZ and LMBS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VETZ and LMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VETZ vs. LMBS — Risk / Return Rank
VETZ
LMBS
VETZ vs. LMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VETZ | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 3.15 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 4.87 | -2.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.63 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 4.27 | -1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 18.30 | -10.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VETZ | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 3.15 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
VETZ vs. LMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VETZ drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum LMBS drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETZ and LMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VETZ | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -6.49% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -1.43% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.24% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -0.80% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.33% | +0.45% |
Volatility
VETZ vs. LMBS - Volatility Comparison
Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) at 0.67%. This indicates that VETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VETZ | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 0.67% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 1.45% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 1.97% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 2.56% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 2.36% | +3.79% |
VETZ vs. LMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VETZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LMBS's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
VETZ vs. LMBS - Dividend Comparison
VETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than LMBS's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMBS First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.10% | 4.08% | 4.28% | 3.96% | 2.22% | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.76% | 2.73% | 2.84% | 3.03% |
VETZ Academy Veteran Bond ETF | 6.17% | 6.14% | 5.89% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VETZ and LMBS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VETZ has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to LMBS (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VETZ dropped -5.16% vs LMBS's -6.49%.
On 1-year performance, VETZ leads with 6.99% vs 6.17% for LMBS. On fees, VETZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LMBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VETZ has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VETZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LMBS.
VETZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 4.10% for LMBS.
They also come from different issuers: Academy and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VETZ and 0.68% for LMBS.
LMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VETZ and LMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer