PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VETZ vs. GBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VETZ vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Academy Veteran Impact ETF (VETZ) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VETZ vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VETZ
Academy Veteran Impact ETF
0.76%8.02%2.22%3.97%
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
0.80%4.12%5.24%2.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VETZ achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 0.80% return.


VETZ

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
0.76%
6M
2.92%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VETZ vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VETZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VETZ vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VETZ
VETZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VETZ vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Academy Veteran Impact ETF (VETZ) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VETZGBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

16.02

-14.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

81.72

-80.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

24.01

-22.82

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

199.80

-197.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.19

1,295.81

-1,289.62

VETZ vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VETZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VETZ and GBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VETZGBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

16.02

-14.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

4.79

-3.88

Correlation

The correlation between VETZ and GBIL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VETZ vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

VETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than GBIL's 3.89% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VETZ
Academy Veteran Impact ETF
6.11%6.14%5.89%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.89%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%

Drawdowns

VETZ vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VETZ drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETZ and GBIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VETZGBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-0.76%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-0.02%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-0.04%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.00%

+0.97%

Volatility

VETZ vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

Academy Veteran Impact ETF (VETZ) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that VETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VETZGBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

0.08%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

0.15%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.52%

0.25%

+5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

0.58%

+5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.27%

0.47%

+5.80%