VETH.DE vs. URNU.L
VETH.DE (VanEck Ethereum ETN) and URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VETH.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MVIS CryptoCompare Ethereum VWAP Close Index, while URNU.L is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VETH.DE returned -7.15%/yr vs 31.95%/yr for URNU.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VETH.DE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for URNU.L.
Performance
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VETH.DE is traded in EUR, while URNU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URNU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VETH.DE achieves a -45.93% return, which is significantly lower than URNU.L's 4.65% return.
VETH.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -23.02%
- YTD
- -45.93%
- 6M
- -45.13%
- 1Y
- -33.69%
- 3Y*
- -7.15%
- 5Y*
- -2.46%
- 10Y*
- —
URNU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 31.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VETH.DE VanEck Ethereum ETN | -45.93% | -21.95% | 52.69% | 89.80% | -8.12% |
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc | 4.65% | 50.27% | 7.87% | 35.71% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VETH.DE and URNU.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L — Risk / Return Rank
VETH.DE
URNU.L
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VETH.DE | URNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.11 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 0.71 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 1.64 | -2.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than URNU.L's maximum drawdown of -40.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETH.DE and URNU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VETH.DE | URNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.77% | -40.87% | -35.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.70% | -32.30% | -33.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.70% | -40.87% | -24.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.81% | -24.50% | -43.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -12.54% | -31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.38% | 14.01% | +25.37% |
Volatility
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.33% compared to Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) at 14.38%. This indicates that VETH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VETH.DE | URNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.33% | 14.38% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.88% | 35.38% | +5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.41% | 49.77% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.52% | 40.43% | +27.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.39% | 40.43% | +30.96% |
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VETH.DE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than URNU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VETH.DE vs. URNU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VETH.DE nor URNU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VETH.DE and URNU.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, URNU.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
URNU.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for VETH.DE.
VETH.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while URNU.L is Uranium. VETH.DE tracks MVIS CryptoCompare Ethereum VWAP Close Index, while URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for VETH.DE and 0.65% for URNU.L.
Find the right allocation for VETH.DE and URNU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer