PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VETA.L vs. GLT5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VETA.L is traded in GBP, while GLT5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLT5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VETA.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than GLT5.L's 0.19% return.


VETA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-0.92%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*

GLT5.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.42%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.82%5.79%-2.93%4.76%-13.59%-9.77%10.65%3.58%
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
0.19%5.31%2.14%3.86%-5.44%-1.89%1.83%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VETA.L and GLT5.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2019

0.49

The correlation between VETA.L and GLT5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VETA.L
VETA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VETA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VETA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GLT5.L
GLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VETA.LGLT5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

1.38

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

4.42

-3.13

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VETA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VETA.L and GLT5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VETA.LGLT5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.01

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.28

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.32

-0.40

Drawdowns

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VETA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.60%, which is greater than GLT5.L's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETA.L and GLT5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VETA.LGLT5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

-10.98%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

-2.20%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.23%

-2.20%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

-10.32%

-10.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-0.92%

-17.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.05%

-2.63%

-12.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.69%

+1.38%

Volatility

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) have volatilities of 1.85% and 1.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VETA.LGLT5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.88%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

2.63%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

3.00%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

3.25%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

2.92%

+5.04%

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VETA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GLT5.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VETA.L vs. GLT5.L - Dividend Comparison

VETA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLT5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.13%4.12%4.43%3.76%1.01%0.19%0.33%0.44%
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VETA.L and GLT5.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLT5.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLT5.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VETA.L.

VETA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while GLT5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VETA.L and 0.06% for GLT5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VETA.L and GLT5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer