PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VETA.L vs. GBPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VETA.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than GBPG.L's 3.08% return.


VETA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-0.92%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*

GBPG.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.16%
YTD
3.08%
6M
0.07%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.82%5.79%-2.93%4.76%-13.59%-3.40%
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
3.08%2.23%0.17%4.28%90.38%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VETA.L and GBPG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.62

The correlation between VETA.L and GBPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VETA.L
VETA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VETA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VETA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GBPG.L
GBPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VETA.LGBPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.90

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

2.44

-1.15

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VETA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VETA.L and GBPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VETA.LGBPG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.49

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.47

-0.55

Drawdowns

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VETA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.60%, which is greater than GBPG.L's maximum drawdown of -7.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VETA.L and GBPG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VETA.LGBPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

-7.18%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

-3.16%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.23%

-3.30%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-1.70%

-17.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.05%

-1.69%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.17%

+0.90%

Volatility

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) at 1.51%. This indicates that VETA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VETA.LGBPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.51%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

5.31%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

5.83%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

35.50%

-28.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

35.50%

-27.54%

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VETA.L and GBPG.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VETA.L vs. GBPG.L - Dividend Comparison

VETA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
4.09%4.13%4.10%3.35%62.57%
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VETA.L and GBPG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VETA.L and GBPG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

VETA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while GBPG.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VETA.L and GBPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer