PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEQT.TO achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than XAW.TO's 13.70% return.


VEQT.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
6.10%
YTD
12.75%
6M
12.66%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*

XAW.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.13%
YTD
13.70%
6M
12.70%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEQT.TO
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio
12.75%20.37%24.73%16.70%-10.76%19.62%11.42%12.94%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
13.70%15.87%26.31%18.45%-11.84%18.38%12.37%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VEQT.TO and XAW.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.96

The correlation between VEQT.TO and XAW.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEQT.TO
XAW.TO

Financial Services

20.7%
13.7%

Technology

20.3%
32.6%

Industrials

11.6%
9.1%

Energy

8.7%
3.3%

Basic Materials

8.6%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
8.8%

Healthcare

6.6%
7.8%

Communication Services

6.0%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.6%

Utilities

2.8%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.4%

Financial Services

VEQT.TO
20.7%
XAW.TO
13.7%

Technology

VEQT.TO
20.3%
XAW.TO
32.6%

Industrials

VEQT.TO
11.6%
XAW.TO
9.1%

Energy

VEQT.TO
8.7%
XAW.TO
3.3%

Basic Materials

VEQT.TO
8.6%
XAW.TO
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VEQT.TO
7.8%
XAW.TO
8.8%

Healthcare

VEQT.TO
6.6%
XAW.TO
7.8%

Communication Services

VEQT.TO
6.0%
XAW.TO
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

VEQT.TO
4.5%
XAW.TO
4.6%

Utilities

VEQT.TO
2.8%
XAW.TO
2.2%

Real Estate

VEQT.TO
2.2%
XAW.TO
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEQT.TO
VEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEQT.TOXAW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.48

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.76

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.38

15.15

+2.23

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEQT.TO and XAW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEQT.TOXAW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.50

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

1.04

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.78

+0.12

Drawdowns

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.45%, which is greater than XAW.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEQT.TO and XAW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEQT.TOXAW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.45%

-27.32%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-8.16%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-16.66%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-21.02%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.37%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-3.91%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.02%

-0.19%

Volatility

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) is 3.68%, while iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that VEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEQT.TOXAW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.21%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

9.85%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

12.25%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

13.56%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

15.12%

+0.65%

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEQT.TO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than XAW.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO - Dividend Comparison

VEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than XAW.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEQT.TO
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio
1.26%1.42%1.58%1.88%2.09%1.40%1.48%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.17%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VEQT.TO and XAW.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XAW.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAW.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for VEQT.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for VEQT.TO and 0.22% for XAW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEQT.TO and XAW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer