PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMPX vs. NMPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMPX) and Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEMPX having a 13.78% return and NMPAX slightly higher at 14.02%. Over the past 10 years, VEMPX has outperformed NMPAX with an annualized return of 12.10%, while NMPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.


VEMPX

1D
-1.01%
1M
3.43%
YTD
13.78%
6M
11.95%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
12.10%

NMPAX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.53%
YTD
14.02%
6M
13.69%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMPX
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
13.78%11.43%15.50%26.98%-26.45%12.48%32.24%28.06%-9.35%18.13%
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
14.02%7.23%13.67%16.32%-13.27%24.66%8.71%25.99%-11.44%15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMPX and NMPAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VEMPX and NMPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMPX vs. NMPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMPX
VEMPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VEMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NMPAX
NMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMPX) and Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMPXNMPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.87

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

10.50

-0.51

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the NMPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMPX and NMPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMPXNMPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.64

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.41

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.50

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMPX drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum NMPAX drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMPX and NMPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMPXNMPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-54.31%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-8.84%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-24.03%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.32%

-24.03%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.62%

-42.09%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.06%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-7.72%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.41%

+0.48%

Volatility

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMPX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) at 4.38%. This indicates that VEMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMPXNMPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.38%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

11.35%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

15.51%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

19.71%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.12%

+1.24%

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NMPAX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEMPX vs. NMPAX - Dividend Comparison

VEMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than NMPAX's 8.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
8.19%9.34%11.35%7.97%11.65%18.03%5.96%5.70%10.06%7.66%7.97%10.12%
VEMPX
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.03%1.15%1.11%1.27%1.17%1.15%1.09%1.32%1.68%1.27%1.46%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VEMPX and NMPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEMPX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to NMPAX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMPX dropped -41.62% vs NMPAX's -54.31%.

VEMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMPX and NMPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer