PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEE.TO achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than ZID.TO's -18.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEE.TO having a 9.01% annualized return and ZID.TO not far behind at 8.81%.


VEE.TO

1D
-0.90%
1M
4.93%
YTD
13.54%
6M
12.96%
1Y
31.71%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
9.01%

ZID.TO

1D
-0.95%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-18.18%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-17.13%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF
13.54%19.32%19.06%6.24%-12.78%0.05%12.32%14.33%-7.95%22.55%
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF
-18.18%-0.67%19.13%11.89%-4.71%25.55%15.79%7.37%8.20%34.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VEE.TO and ZID.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011

0.48

The correlation between VEE.TO and ZID.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEE.TO
ZID.TO

Technology

26.3%
8.7%

Financial Services

20.5%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
13.5%

Basic Materials

8.4%
12.9%

Industrials

7.9%
6.3%

Communication Services

7.8%
0.6%

Energy

4.7%
14.2%

Healthcare

4.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
8.9%

Utilities

3.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.5%

Technology

VEE.TO
26.3%
ZID.TO
8.7%

Financial Services

VEE.TO
20.5%
ZID.TO
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VEE.TO
11.2%
ZID.TO
13.5%

Basic Materials

VEE.TO
8.4%
ZID.TO
12.9%

Industrials

VEE.TO
7.9%
ZID.TO
6.3%

Communication Services

VEE.TO
7.8%
ZID.TO
0.6%

Energy

VEE.TO
4.7%
ZID.TO
14.2%

Healthcare

VEE.TO
4.1%
ZID.TO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VEE.TO
3.9%
ZID.TO
8.9%

Utilities

VEE.TO
3.0%
ZID.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

VEE.TO
2.3%
ZID.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEE.TO
VEE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ZID.TO
ZID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ZID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEE.TOZID.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.84

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

-0.71

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

-1.50

+12.24

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the ZID.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEE.TO and ZID.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEE.TOZID.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-1.03

+3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.18

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.45

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Drawdowns

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEE.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.84%, smaller than the maximum ZID.TO drawdown of -45.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEE.TO and ZID.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEE.TOZID.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.84%

-45.18%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-24.35%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.97%

-27.08%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.10%

-27.08%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.84%

-45.18%

+15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-25.57%

+24.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-11.32%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

11.46%

-8.50%

Volatility

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) have volatilities of 6.04% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEE.TOZID.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.04%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

14.23%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

16.69%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

15.92%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

19.85%

-2.88%

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEE.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZID.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Dividend Comparison

VEE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than ZID.TO's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF
1.91%2.26%2.45%2.83%3.35%2.18%1.61%2.71%2.21%1.89%1.99%2.53%
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF
0.84%0.69%0.28%1.18%0.29%1.24%0.11%0.11%0.74%0.38%1.15%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEE.TO and ZID.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZID.TO.

VEE.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ZID.TO is Asia Pacific Equities. VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while ZID.TO tracks MSCI India ESG Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEE.TO and 0.67% for ZID.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEE.TO and ZID.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer