VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO
VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) and ZID.TO (BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while ZID.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India ESG Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEE.TO returned 9.01%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for ZID.TO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEE.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for ZID.TO.
Performance
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEE.TO achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than ZID.TO's -18.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEE.TO having a 9.01% annualized return and ZID.TO not far behind at 8.81%.
VEE.TO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
ZID.TO
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -18.18%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 13.54% | 19.32% | 19.06% | 6.24% | -12.78% | 0.05% | 12.32% | 14.33% | -7.95% | 22.55% |
ZID.TO BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF | -18.18% | -0.67% | 19.13% | 11.89% | -4.71% | 25.55% | 15.79% | 7.37% | 8.20% | 34.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEE.TO and ZID.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011 | 0.48 |
The correlation between VEE.TO and ZID.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Financial Services
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Basic Materials
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Industrials
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Communication Services
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Energy
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Healthcare
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Consumer Defensive
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Utilities
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Real Estate
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VEE.TO
ZID.TO
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEE.TO | ZID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.84 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | -0.71 | +3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.74 | -1.50 | +12.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEE.TO | ZID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | -1.03 | +3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.18 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.35 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEE.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.84%, smaller than the maximum ZID.TO drawdown of -45.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEE.TO and ZID.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEE.TO | ZID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -45.18% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -24.35% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.97% | -27.08% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.10% | -27.08% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.84% | -45.18% | +15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -25.57% | +24.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -11.32% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 11.46% | -8.50% |
Volatility
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) have volatilities of 6.04% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEE.TO | ZID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 6.04% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 14.23% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 16.69% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 15.92% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 19.85% | -2.88% |
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEE.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZID.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEE.TO vs. ZID.TO - Dividend Comparison
VEE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than ZID.TO's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.83% | 3.35% | 2.18% | 1.61% | 2.71% | 2.21% | 1.89% | 1.99% | 2.53% |
ZID.TO BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF | 0.84% | 0.69% | 0.28% | 1.18% | 0.29% | 1.24% | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.74% | 0.38% | 1.15% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEE.TO and ZID.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZID.TO.
VEE.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ZID.TO is Asia Pacific Equities. VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while ZID.TO tracks MSCI India ESG Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEE.TO and 0.67% for ZID.TO.
Find the right allocation for VEE.TO and ZID.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer