PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) and XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEE.TO returned 9.42%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for XQQ.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEE.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XQQ.TO.

Performance

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEE.TO achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's 19.59% return. Over the past 10 years, VEE.TO has underperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 9.42%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.19% annualized return.

VEE.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
5.84%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.71%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
9.42%

XQQ.TO

1D
3.04%
1M
4.80%
YTD
19.59%
6M
17.73%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
24.45%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
20.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF		15.16%19.32%19.06%6.24%-12.79%0.06%12.32%14.32%-7.93%22.60%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		19.59%15.77%24.69%53.25%-33.13%22.76%46.12%38.92%-1.32%33.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VEE.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2011

0.57

The correlation between VEE.TO and XQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (5 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VEE.TO
XQQ.TO

Technology

26.3%
53.7%

Financial Services

20.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
12.2%

Basic Materials

8.4%
1.1%

Industrials

7.9%
3.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
15.8%

Energy

4.7%
0.6%

Healthcare

4.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
7.7%

Utilities

3.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.1%

Technology

VEE.TO
26.3%
XQQ.TO
53.7%

Financial Services

VEE.TO
20.5%
XQQ.TO
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VEE.TO
11.2%
XQQ.TO
12.2%

Basic Materials

VEE.TO
8.4%
XQQ.TO
1.1%

Industrials

VEE.TO
7.9%
XQQ.TO
3.1%

Communication Services

VEE.TO
7.8%
XQQ.TO
15.8%

Energy

VEE.TO
4.7%
XQQ.TO
0.6%

Healthcare

VEE.TO
4.1%
XQQ.TO
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VEE.TO
3.9%
XQQ.TO
7.7%

Utilities

VEE.TO
3.0%
XQQ.TO
1.4%

Real Estate

VEE.TO
2.3%
XQQ.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with VEE.TO:
VEE.TO vs. XEC.TOVEE.TO vs. ZEM.TOVEE.TO vs. VFV.TOVEE.TO vs. XEQT.TOVEE.TO vs. VIDY.TOVEE.TO vs. VOOVEE.TO vs. VXUS
Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO

Return for Risk

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VEE.TO
VEE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VEE.TOXQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.04
2.05

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.82
2.68

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.43

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

8.08

+2.76

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEE.TO and XQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEE.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.84%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -38.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEE.TO and XQQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VEE.TOXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.84%

-38.25%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-14.68%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.97%

-22.72%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.10%

-38.25%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.84%

-38.25%

+8.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-5.96%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.42%

-1.42%

Volatility

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) is 7.28%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that VEE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VEE.TOXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

7.98%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

14.18%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

17.42%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

22.77%

-7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

22.53%

-5.52%

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEE.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEE.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

VEE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF		1.89%2.26%2.45%2.83%3.35%2.18%1.62%2.71%2.24%1.93%2.01%2.53%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.21%0.25%0.67%0.93%1.27%0.52%0.80%1.44%1.61%1.64%2.35%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

VEE.TO and XQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

VEE.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEE.TO and 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEE.TO and XQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer