PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEE.TO vs. VA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEE.TO achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly lower than VA.TO's 32.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VEE.TO has underperformed VA.TO with an annualized return of 9.01%, while VA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.


VEE.TO

1D
-0.90%
1M
4.93%
YTD
13.54%
6M
12.96%
1Y
31.71%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
9.01%

VA.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
12.67%
YTD
32.04%
6M
32.64%
1Y
55.12%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF
13.54%19.32%19.06%6.24%-12.78%0.05%12.32%14.33%-7.95%22.55%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF
32.04%25.82%10.30%12.15%-9.26%0.89%13.71%11.66%-7.54%21.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VEE.TO and VA.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014

0.62

The correlation between VEE.TO and VA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (5 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEE.TO
VA.TO

Technology

26.3%
22.4%

Financial Services

20.5%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.7%

Basic Materials

8.4%
7.2%

Industrials

7.9%
20.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.7%
1.6%

Healthcare

4.1%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.5%

Utilities

3.0%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.3%
4.3%

Technology

VEE.TO
26.3%
VA.TO
22.4%

Financial Services

VEE.TO
20.5%
VA.TO
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VEE.TO
11.2%
VA.TO
9.7%

Basic Materials

VEE.TO
8.4%
VA.TO
7.2%

Industrials

VEE.TO
7.9%
VA.TO
20.6%

Communication Services

VEE.TO
7.8%
VA.TO
4.8%

Energy

VEE.TO
4.7%
VA.TO
1.6%

Healthcare

VEE.TO
4.1%
VA.TO
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

VEE.TO
3.9%
VA.TO
3.5%

Utilities

VEE.TO
3.0%
VA.TO
1.6%

Real Estate

VEE.TO
2.3%
VA.TO
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEE.TO
VEE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VA.TO
VA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEE.TOVA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.53

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

4.58

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

17.84

-7.10

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the VA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEE.TO and VA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEE.TOVA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.92

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.90

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.69

-0.25

Drawdowns

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEE.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.84%, which is greater than VA.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEE.TO and VA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEE.TOVA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.84%

-25.81%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-12.09%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.97%

-13.99%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.10%

-24.74%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.84%

-25.81%

-4.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-5.54%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.10%

-0.14%

Volatility

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) is 6.04%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that VEE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEE.TOVA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.56%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

16.40%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

18.96%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

14.77%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

15.15%

+1.82%

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEE.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEE.TO vs. VA.TO - Dividend Comparison

VEE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than VA.TO's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF
1.65%2.17%2.31%2.57%3.09%2.35%2.14%2.53%2.84%1.71%1.62%1.88%
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF
1.91%2.26%2.45%2.83%3.35%2.18%1.61%2.71%2.21%1.89%1.99%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEE.TO and VA.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEE.TO.

VEE.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VA.TO is Asia Pacific Equities. VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEE.TO and 0.22% for VA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEE.TO and VA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer