VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO
VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) and CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while CBIL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. VEE.TO is passively managed, while CBIL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VEE.TO returned 18.62%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for CBIL.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. VEE.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBIL.TO.
Performance
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEE.TO achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than CBIL.TO's 0.85% return.
VEE.TO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 13.54% | 19.32% | 19.06% | 3.17% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 2.68% | 4.47% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEE.TO and CBIL.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2023 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VEE.TO
CBIL.TO
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEE.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 5.38 | -3.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 58.74 | -55.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.74 | 339.60 | -328.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEE.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 9.47 | -7.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 11.64 | -11.19 |
Drawdowns
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEE.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.84%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEE.TO and CBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEE.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -0.06% | -29.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -0.04% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.97% | -0.06% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | 0.00% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -0.00% | -8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 0.01% | +2.95% |
Volatility
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that VEE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEE.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 0.08% | +5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 0.19% | +12.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 0.25% | +15.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 0.31% | +14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 0.31% | +16.66% |
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEE.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
VEE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than CBIL.TO's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.29% | 2.59% | 4.38% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.83% | 3.35% | 2.18% | 1.61% | 2.71% | 2.21% | 1.89% | 1.99% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEE.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEE.TO.
VEE.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CBIL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEE.TO and 0.10% for CBIL.TO.
Find the right allocation for VEE.TO and CBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer