PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VECA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VECA.DE achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than QDVL.DE's 0.74% return.


VECA.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.60%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*

QDVL.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VECA.DE
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.53%2.98%4.38%7.53%-13.48%-1.05%2.50%4.88%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.74%2.81%4.24%4.30%-3.63%-0.34%0.56%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VECA.DE and QDVL.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.55

The correlation between VECA.DE and QDVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VECA.DE
VECA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VECA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VECA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VECA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VECA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VECA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VECA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VECA.DEQDVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.33

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.08

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

8.99

-6.64

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VECA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VECA.DE and QDVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VECA.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.65

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.01

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.32

-0.12

Drawdowns

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VECA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, which is greater than QDVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VECA.DE and QDVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VECA.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-8.22%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-0.93%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.63%

-0.93%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

-4.90%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.01%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-0.71%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.22%

+0.55%

Volatility

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VECA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) at 0.34%. This indicates that VECA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VECA.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.34%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

1.02%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

1.18%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

1.58%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

2.86%

+1.86%

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VECA.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VECA.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

VECA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%
VECA.DE
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VECA.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VECA.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VECA.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

VECA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VECA.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VECA.DE and QDVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer