PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDST.L vs. VWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDST.L achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 11.69% return.


VDST.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*

VWRA.L

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.44%
YTD
11.69%
6M
13.31%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
1.42%4.26%5.24%4.98%0.95%0.01%0.03%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
11.69%22.45%17.65%22.28%-18.11%18.46%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VDST.L and VWRA.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDST.L
VDST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VDST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VDST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDST.LVWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+18.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.86

1.44

+3.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

35.91

3.34

+32.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

243.54

14.01

+229.53

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDST.L Sharpe Ratio is 9.29, which is higher than the VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDST.L and VWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDST.LVWRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29

2.37

+6.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.03

0.73

+7.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.82

0.78

+7.04

Drawdowns

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDST.L drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum VWRA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDST.L and VWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDST.LVWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-33.62%

+33.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.11%

-8.78%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.15%

-16.26%

+16.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-26.06%

+25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.67%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-5.39%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

2.10%

-2.08%

Volatility

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) is 0.12%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that VDST.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDST.LVWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

3.86%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.33%

9.78%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42%

12.38%

-11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.47%

15.37%

-14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.46%

17.29%

-16.83%

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDST.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDST.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDST.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VDST.L and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDST.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDST.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

VDST.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. VDST.L tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VDST.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDST.L and VWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer