PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDST.L vs. VUTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDST.L is traded in USD, while VUTA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUTA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDST.L achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than VUTA.L's -0.41% return.


VDST.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*

VUTA.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.13%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
2.78%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
1.42%4.26%5.24%4.98%0.95%0.01%0.03%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.41%6.34%0.80%3.29%-12.37%-1.98%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VDST.L and VUTA.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDST.L
VDST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VDST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VDST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VUTA.L
VUTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDST.LVUTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+20.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.86

1.13

+3.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

35.91

1.18

+34.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

243.54

3.46

+240.08

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDST.L Sharpe Ratio is 9.29, which is higher than the VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDST.L and VUTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDST.LVUTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29

0.73

+8.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.03

-0.06

+8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.82

0.16

+7.66

Drawdowns

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDST.L drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum VUTA.L drawdown of -19.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDST.L and VUTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDST.LVUTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-19.22%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.11%

-3.10%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.15%

-5.46%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-16.63%

+16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-7.61%

+7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-8.42%

+8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

1.06%

-1.04%

Volatility

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) is 0.12%, while Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that VDST.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDST.LVUTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

1.54%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.33%

3.73%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42%

5.01%

-4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.47%

7.03%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.46%

7.21%

-6.75%

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VDST.L and VUTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDST.L vs. VUTA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDST.L nor VUTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VDST.L and VUTA.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDST.L and VUTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

VDST.L tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index, while VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDST.L and VUTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer