PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDPA.L is traded in USD, while CBS5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CBS5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPA.L achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than CBS5.L's 0.19% return.


VDPA.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*

CBS5.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VDPA.L and CBS5.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPA.L
VDPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CBS5.L
CBS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDPA.LCBS5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.16

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

7.49

-0.73

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPA.L and CBS5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDPA.LCBS5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.01

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.68

-0.35

Drawdowns

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than CBS5.L's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPA.L and CBS5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDPA.LCBS5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-5.49%

-15.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-1.98%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

-2.13%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.89%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-0.90%

-5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.57%

+0.29%

Volatility

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) at 1.43%. This indicates that VDPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBS5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDPA.LCBS5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

1.43%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.59%

3.34%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.54%

4.23%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

5.91%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.78%

5.91%

+2.87%

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CBS5.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDPA.L vs. CBS5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPA.L nor CBS5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VDPA.L and CBS5.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBS5.L.

VDPA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index, while CBS5.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VDPA.L and 0.20% for CBS5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDPA.L and CBS5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer