VDIG vs. LSVD

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

VDIG (Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

VDIG vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDIG achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.43% return.

VDIG

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 1.33%
• YTD: 3.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSVD

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: 14.25%
• YTD: 17.43%
• 1Y: 35.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDIG vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF	3.45%	3.50%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	17.43%	4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VDIG and LSVD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

VDIG vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 91
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDIG vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VDIG	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.93	—

Drawdowns

VDIG vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDIG and LSVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDIG	LSVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.20%	-19.30%	+8.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.88%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-2.49%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VDIG	LSVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.18%	13.19%	-2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.18%	17.42%	-6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.18%	17.42%	-6.24%

VDIG vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VDIG and LSVD have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

VDIG vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison

VDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than LSVD's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.27%	0.32%
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF	0.12%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDIG and LSVD in my portfolio?

VDIG and LSVD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VDIG or LSVD?

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VDIG or LSVD?

VDIG and LSVD have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VDIG or LSVD?

LSVD has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.12% for VDIG.

What is the main difference between VDIG and LSVD?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and LSV.