VDIG vs. BND
VDIG (Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDIG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. VDIG is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDIG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
VDIG vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDIG achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.05% return.
VDIG
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
VDIG vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF | -0.22% | 3.68% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.05% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDIG and BND is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDIG vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
VDIG
BND
VDIG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDIG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
VDIG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDIG and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDIG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -18.58% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -2.67% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -3.06% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
VDIG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDIG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 3.76% | +7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 6.02% | +5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 5.53% | +5.81% |
VDIG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDIG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDIG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BND's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDIG and BND have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for VDIG.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.13% for VDIG.
VDIG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for VDIG and 0.03% for BND.
Find the right allocation for VDIG and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer