VDE vs. BND
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDE returned 9.47%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. VDE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
VDE vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 32.48% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 9.47%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.
VDE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 32.48%
- 6M
- 28.99%
- 1Y
- 48.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
BND
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
VDE vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 32.48% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.41% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and BND is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | -0.20 |
The correlation between VDE and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.06 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
BND
VDE vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDE | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 1.73 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 5.21 | +6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDE | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.24 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.02 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.29 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.59 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
VDE vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -18.58% | -55.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -2.68% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -5.92% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -17.91% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | -18.58% | -50.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -2.23% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -3.06% | -16.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 0.89% | +3.13% |
Volatility
VDE vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.22%. This indicates that VDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 1.22% | +6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 2.66% | +13.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.34% | 3.78% | +16.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.40% | 6.02% | +20.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 5.53% | +24.40% |
VDE vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDE vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.37% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and BND have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to BND (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 10-year performance, VDE leads with 9.47% vs 1.61% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VDE has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDE.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.37% for VDE.
VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.03% for BND.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDE and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer