PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF (VDBA.AX) and Vanguard FTSE Asia ex Japan Shares Index ETF (VAE.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDBA.AX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than VAE.AX's 21.68% return.


VDBA.AX

1D
0.25%
1M
2.28%
YTD
2.53%
6M
3.26%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*

VAE.AX

1D
0.71%
1M
10.83%
YTD
21.68%
6M
22.27%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDBA.AX
Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF
2.53%8.98%10.73%10.63%-10.82%8.80%5.65%16.12%-0.09%0.78%
VAE.AX
Vanguard FTSE Asia ex Japan Shares Index ETF
21.68%23.44%21.19%3.47%-12.49%1.62%13.53%17.38%-5.20%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VDBA.AX and VAE.AX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017

0.47

The correlation between VDBA.AX and VAE.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDBA.AX
VDBA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VDBA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDBA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDBA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VDBA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDBA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VAE.AX
VAE.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VAE.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAE.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAE.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VAE.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAE.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF (VDBA.AX) and Vanguard FTSE Asia ex Japan Shares Index ETF (VAE.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDBA.AXVAE.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.50

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.13

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

14.11

-7.46

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDBA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the VAE.AX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDBA.AX and VAE.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDBA.AXVAE.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.74

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.63

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.74

+0.06

Drawdowns

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDBA.AX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum VAE.AX drawdown of -29.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDBA.AX and VAE.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDBA.AXVAE.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-29.76%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-10.43%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.89%

-10.43%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.82%

-27.63%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-7.24%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

3.06%

-1.69%

Volatility

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF (VDBA.AX) is 2.10%, while Vanguard FTSE Asia ex Japan Shares Index ETF (VAE.AX) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that VDBA.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAE.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDBA.AXVAE.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

5.67%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

13.60%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.17%

15.77%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

14.87%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.42%

14.55%

-7.13%

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDBA.AX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than VAE.AX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDBA.AX vs. VAE.AX - Dividend Comparison

VDBA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VAE.AX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VAE.AX
Vanguard FTSE Asia ex Japan Shares Index ETF
1.44%1.87%1.81%2.21%2.50%1.71%2.19%2.11%2.93%2.64%2.26%
VDBA.AX
Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF
3.49%2.83%1.97%1.56%3.25%9.02%5.12%1.72%1.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDBA.AX and VAE.AX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDBA.AX is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDBA.AX is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for VAE.AX.

VDBA.AX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VAE.AX is Asia Pacific Equities. VDBA.AX tracks Balanced Composite Index, while VAE.AX tracks FTSE Asia Pacific ex Japan, Australia and New Zealand Index. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for VDBA.AX and 0.40% for VAE.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDBA.AX and VAE.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer