VCR vs. XDWC.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE).

VCR and XDWC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. XDWC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. Both VCR and XDWC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF	-7.95%	5.77%	24.27%	40.38%	-35.15%	24.86%	48.36%	27.45%	-2.31%	22.82%
XDWC.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C	-9.91%	8.35%	21.98%	35.47%	-33.64%	17.48%	36.36%	28.21%	-7.16%	23.93%

Different Trading Currencies

VCR is traded in USD, while XDWC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDWC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly higher than XDWC.DE's -9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has outperformed XDWC.DE with an annualized return of 12.56%, while XDWC.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.

VCR

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: -7.95%
• 6M: -8.86%
• 1Y: 10.82%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: 4.88%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

XDWC.DE

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.91%
• 6M: -8.56%
• 1Y: 8.57%
• 3Y*: 11.73%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWC.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDWC.DE

Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C

VCR

Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

Return for Risk

VCR vs. XDWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR

VCR Risk / Return Rank: 27
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

XDWC.DE

XDWC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 13
XDWC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XDWC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XDWC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XDWC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XDWC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VCR	XDWC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.42	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.74	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.09	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	0.49	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.51	1.71	+0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the XDWC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and XDWC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VCR	XDWC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.42	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.18	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.52	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.52	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and XDWC.DE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while XDWC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF	0.79%	0.74%	0.74%	0.84%	0.98%	0.79%	1.71%	1.17%	1.37%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%
XDWC.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than XDWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and XDWC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCR	XDWC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.54%	-35.13%	-26.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.59%	-14.75%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.20%	-33.47%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	-35.13%	-4.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.14%	-16.44%	+4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-8.12%	-1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	4.87%	-0.09%

Volatility

VCR vs. XDWC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE) have volatilities of 7.41% and 7.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCR	XDWC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	7.20%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	12.57%	+1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.28%	20.58%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.94%	20.77%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	19.48%	+2.85%