PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCNS.TO achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 10.30% return.


VCNS.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.27%
YTD
5.71%
6M
3.72%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*

FEQT.NEO

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.01%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.63%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VCNS.TO
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio
5.71%8.13%6.79%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
10.30%19.42%14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VCNS.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.83

The correlation between VCNS.TO and FEQT.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCNS.TO
VCNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VCNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCNS.TOFEQT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.99

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

12.96

-2.96

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCNS.TO and FEQT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCNS.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.26

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.77

-1.51

Drawdowns

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCNS.TO and FEQT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCNS.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-13.24%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-8.31%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.02%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-1.45%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.91%

-0.69%

Volatility

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS.TO) is 2.44%, while Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that VCNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCNS.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

3.89%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.31%

8.88%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.22%

11.01%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

12.45%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.48%

12.45%

+79.03%

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCNS.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCNS.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

VCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.82%0.91%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCNS.TO
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio
2.43%2.54%2.58%2.57%2.28%2.09%1.88%2.28%75.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCNS.TO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCNS.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VCNS.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCNS.TO and FEQT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer