VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO
VCN.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF) and ZUT.TO (BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index, while ZUT.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VCN.TO returned 12.42%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for ZUT.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCN.TO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZUT.TO.
Performance
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCN.TO achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than ZUT.TO's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VCN.TO has outperformed ZUT.TO with an annualized return of 12.42%, while ZUT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.18% annualized return.
VCN.TO
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
ZUT.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCN.TO Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF | 10.48% | 30.20% | 22.14% | 12.26% | -5.78% | 25.63% | 4.81% | 22.06% | -9.11% | 8.44% |
ZUT.TO BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF | 20.31% | 15.25% | 14.13% | -5.37% | -8.69% | 5.45% | 28.15% | 35.59% | -8.02% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCN.TO and ZUT.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2013 | 0.42 |
The correlation between VCN.TO and ZUT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Energy
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
Basic Materials
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Industrials
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Technology
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Utilities
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
Real Estate
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Communication Services
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Healthcare
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VCN.TO
ZUT.TO
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCN.TO | ZUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 2.87 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.03 | 7.24 | +9.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCN.TO | ZUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.47 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.53 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.62 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.58 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum ZUT.TO drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCN.TO and ZUT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCN.TO | ZUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -37.08% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -8.96% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -21.44% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.12% | -32.42% | +16.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -37.08% | -0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.24% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -6.33% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.55% | -1.60% |
Volatility
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) at 2.42%. This indicates that VCN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCN.TO | ZUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 2.42% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 8.27% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 10.62% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 13.95% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 16.50% | -1.52% |
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCN.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ZUT.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCN.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Dividend Comparison
VCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than ZUT.TO's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCN.TO Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF | 2.00% | 2.27% | 2.69% | 2.99% | 3.15% | 2.48% | 2.70% | 2.85% | 2.80% | 2.29% | 2.34% | 2.65% |
ZUT.TO BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF | 2.77% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 4.35% | 3.95% | 3.25% | 3.31% | 4.00% | 4.59% | 3.71% | 3.98% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCN.TO and ZUT.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZUT.TO.
VCN.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZUT.TO is Utilities Equities. VCN.TO tracks FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index, while ZUT.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VCN.TO and 0.61% for ZUT.TO.
Find the right allocation for VCN.TO and ZUT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer