PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VCN.TO having a 10.48% return and ZCN.TO slightly higher at 10.70%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VCN.TO having a 12.42% annualized return and ZCN.TO not far ahead at 12.62%.


VCN.TO

1D
-1.03%
1M
3.61%
YTD
10.48%
6M
12.01%
1Y
33.06%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*
12.42%

ZCN.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
3.62%
YTD
10.70%
6M
12.95%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF
10.48%30.20%22.14%12.26%-5.78%25.63%4.81%22.06%-9.11%8.44%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
10.70%31.51%21.64%11.63%-5.84%25.05%5.69%22.85%-8.84%8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VCN.TO and ZCN.TO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2013

0.91

The correlation between VCN.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VCN.TO
ZCN.TO

Financial Services

33.7%
32.8%

Energy

18.5%
17.5%

Basic Materials

17.6%
18.4%

Industrials

10.5%
10.3%

Technology

7.5%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.9%

Utilities

2.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.6%

Communication Services

1.4%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.1%

Financial Services

VCN.TO
33.7%
ZCN.TO
32.8%

Energy

VCN.TO
18.5%
ZCN.TO
17.5%

Basic Materials

VCN.TO
17.6%
ZCN.TO
18.4%

Industrials

VCN.TO
10.5%
ZCN.TO
10.3%

Technology

VCN.TO
7.5%
ZCN.TO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VCN.TO
3.7%
ZCN.TO
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

VCN.TO
2.8%
ZCN.TO
2.9%

Utilities

VCN.TO
2.7%
ZCN.TO
3.2%

Real Estate

VCN.TO
1.5%
ZCN.TO
1.6%

Communication Services

VCN.TO
1.4%
ZCN.TO
1.8%

Healthcare

VCN.TO
0.1%
ZCN.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCN.TO
VCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCN.TO
ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCN.TOZCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.75

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.03

17.48

-0.45

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCN.TO and ZCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCN.TOZCN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.76

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

1.15

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.68

+0.10

Drawdowns

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum ZCN.TO drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCN.TO and ZCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCN.TOZCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-37.18%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-9.30%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-12.25%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

-16.25%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-37.18%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.14%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-4.76%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.99%

-0.04%

Volatility

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCN.TOZCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.49%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

10.31%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

12.66%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

13.09%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

14.99%

-0.01%

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VCN.TO and ZCN.TO have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCN.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

VCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than ZCN.TO's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF
2.00%2.27%2.69%2.99%3.15%2.48%2.70%2.85%2.80%2.29%2.34%2.65%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.03%2.22%2.78%3.29%3.27%2.74%3.24%3.13%3.16%2.71%2.84%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VCN.TO and ZCN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCN.TO and ZCN.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

VCN.TO tracks FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index, while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCN.TO and ZCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer