PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCN.TO achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than QQU.TO's 40.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VCN.TO has underperformed QQU.TO with an annualized return of 12.42%, while QQU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 33.24% annualized return.


VCN.TO

1D
-1.03%
1M
3.61%
YTD
10.48%
6M
12.01%
1Y
33.06%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*
12.42%

QQU.TO

1D
-0.47%
1M
21.48%
YTD
40.64%
6M
35.68%
1Y
80.49%
3Y*
46.76%
5Y*
22.94%
10Y*
33.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF
10.48%30.20%22.14%12.26%-5.78%25.63%4.81%22.06%-9.11%8.44%
QQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
40.64%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%52.20%83.84%80.24%-11.03%68.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VCN.TO and QQU.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2013

0.56

The correlation between VCN.TO and QQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VCN.TO
QQU.TO

Financial Services

33.7%
0.2%

Energy

18.5%
0.6%

Basic Materials

17.6%
1.1%

Industrials

10.5%
3.1%

Technology

7.5%
53.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
7.7%

Utilities

2.7%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.4%
15.8%

Healthcare

0.1%
4.2%

Financial Services

VCN.TO
33.7%
QQU.TO
0.2%

Energy

VCN.TO
18.5%
QQU.TO
0.6%

Basic Materials

VCN.TO
17.6%
QQU.TO
1.1%

Industrials

VCN.TO
10.5%
QQU.TO
3.1%

Technology

VCN.TO
7.5%
QQU.TO
53.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VCN.TO
3.7%
QQU.TO
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

VCN.TO
2.8%
QQU.TO
7.7%

Utilities

VCN.TO
2.7%
QQU.TO
1.4%

Real Estate

VCN.TO
1.5%
QQU.TO
0.1%

Communication Services

VCN.TO
1.4%
QQU.TO
15.8%

Healthcare

VCN.TO
0.1%
QQU.TO
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCN.TO
VCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QQU.TO
QQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCN.TOQQU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.13

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.03

10.71

+6.32

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the QQU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCN.TO and QQU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCN.TOQQU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.55

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.51

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.75

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.55

+0.22

Drawdowns

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum QQU.TO drawdown of -78.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCN.TO and QQU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCN.TOQQU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-78.51%

+41.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-25.85%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-43.00%

+30.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

-64.83%

+48.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-64.83%

+27.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.47%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-17.02%

+13.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

7.54%

-5.59%

Volatility

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) is 3.41%, while BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that VCN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCN.TOQQU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

9.23%

-5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

24.31%

-14.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

31.70%

-19.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

44.86%

-31.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

44.86%

-29.88%

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCN.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QQU.TO's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCN.TO vs. QQU.TO - Dividend Comparison

VCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while QQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF
2.00%2.27%2.69%2.99%3.15%2.48%2.70%2.85%2.80%2.29%2.34%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCN.TO and QQU.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QQU.TO.

VCN.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while QQU.TO is Nasdaq-100. VCN.TO tracks FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index, while QQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VCN.TO and 1.46% for QQU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCN.TO and QQU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer