PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCLT vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCLT vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCLT achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than VCSH's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VCLT has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 2.31%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.70% annualized return.


VCLT

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.49%
YTD
0.99%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
2.31%

VCSH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCLT vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.99%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.64%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VCLT and VCSH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.63

The correlation between VCLT and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCLT vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCLT vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCLTVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.48

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

3.29

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

13.55

-9.93

VCLT vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCLT and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCLTVCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.45

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.81

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.81

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.02

-0.62

Drawdowns

VCLT vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCLT drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLT and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCLTVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-12.86%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

-1.40%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-1.40%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

-9.48%

-24.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

-12.86%

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.36%

-0.32%

-14.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-0.97%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

0.34%

+1.79%

Volatility

VCLT vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.57%. This indicates that VCLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCLTVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

0.57%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

1.38%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

1.88%

+6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

2.88%

+9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.84%

3.35%

+9.49%

VCLT vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VCLT and VCSH have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCLT vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than VCSH's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.55%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCLT and VCSH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCLT has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to VCSH (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLT dropped -34.31% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 10-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.70% vs 2.31% for VCLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.70% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCLT and VCSH have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 4.45% for VCSH.

VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index, while VCSH tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCLT and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer