PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCFVX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I International Value (VCFVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCFVX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 3.65% return.


VCFVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.57%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
8.23%

GSIMX

1D
0.22%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
3.65%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.87%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCFVX
VALIC Company I International Value
9.13%26.65%8.44%14.26%-10.88%7.05%5.04%16.37%-17.81%17.01%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
3.65%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VCFVX and GSIMX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.75

The correlation between VCFVX and GSIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCFVX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCFVX
VCFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VCFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VCFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I International Value (VCFVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCFVXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.35

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

4.15

+4.45

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCFVX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCFVX drawdown since its inception was -67.44%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCFVX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCFVXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.44%

-28.84%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-7.81%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-10.32%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.63%

-25.37%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-6.24%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.05%

-4.81%

-19.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.53%

+0.81%

Volatility

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I International Value (VCFVX) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.83%. This indicates that VCFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCFVXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

2.83%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

8.21%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

9.89%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.37%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

15.67%

+1.05%

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCFVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCFVX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

VCFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than GSIMX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.94%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%
VCFVX
VALIC Company I International Value
8.18%0.00%1.66%8.36%1.90%1.59%2.37%2.77%2.31%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCFVX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCFVX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to GSIMX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCFVX dropped -67.44% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

VCFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCFVX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer